We have always held the Poltimore tiara in high regard for one reason only: it stars in the undisputed greatest tiara photo in the history of history.
Naturally, the question “Why aren’t more ladies wearing their tiaras in the bath?” is rendered rhetorical when We consider most people use bath-time as an opportunity to wash their hair. So let us just bask in the glory of Princess Margaret and those delightfully oversized English bathtubs. (Your Blog Hostess was lucky enough to have one when she lived in Manchester. Your petite Blog Hostess could float on her back, completely stretched out, as if she were in a pool. Good times.)Anywho…back to the centerpiece of the post, the tiara itself. This imposing Neo-Classical pieces towers white and high like the Cliffs of Dover. The Hadrian’s Wall of Tiaras is made up of “stylized” leaves, flowers and vines.
This bad-boy was made by Garrad in 1870 for the wife of the 2nd Baron Poltimore. (The baron, interesting tidbit, was treasurer to Queen Victoria’s household from 1872 to 1874. Neat, huh?) The 4th Baron Poltimore sold the tiara for £5,500 on January 29, 1959. It was “acquired for Princess Margaret” to commemorate-but-prior-to-the-official-announcement of her engagement to Anthony Armstrong-Jones. Princess Margaret sported the tiara in alternate forms prior to the wedding on May 6, 1960. The Poltimore converts into a flexible necklace and its larger diamond clusters pop out (for lack of a better word) to be worn as brooches. 1 Poltimore Tiara yields 11 Poltimore brooches, in case you were wondering. Plus the tiara was crafted with its own screwdriver to detach aforementioned brooches. (Seriously. We can’t make this up. It’s all in the auction notes.) In order to attain necklace form, the 11 brooches must be removed anyhow.Princess Margaret’s wedding was the first televised British royal wedding during which the Poltimore in its full glory was first debuted. (Insert angelic choir ‘hallelujahs’ here.) Now what kind of Blog Hostess would We be if we posted a photo of the first televised British wedding? Yeah, that’s right. Vid. E. O.
There are multiple theories as to why Princess Margaret was able to pull off a tiara that seems to trump any other British diamond tiara in size, gravitas and sass. The Countess of Snowdon was quite petite and the tiara simply helped to elevate her frame. Her wedding dress was quite simple thus counter-balancing the elaborate tiara. The stylish, sometimes rebellious princess had a personality to match the grand tiara. Being of dainty frame and fashion-backward, We feel unqualified to weigh in on any of these theories ourselves. Just thought We’d put the ideas out there for you to discuss amongst yourselves.

Princess Margaret wears the Poltimore Tiara as (L to R) a tiara; necklace and brooch and in an up-do as agriettes.
The tiara, like so many others, was auctioned off to pay a hefty inheritance tax. Viscount Linley and Lady Sarah Chatto put the tiara and many other jewels once belonging to the Countess of Snowdon up for bidding in 2006. Its value estimated at $360,000, the Poltimore tiara was sold to yet-another anonymous collector for $1.7 million. Anyone else feel like we’re seeing a theme here? Are tiaras appreciating in value? CNN Finance refused to comment. Alright, fine. We never asked. It just sounded good.
Happy Friday, everyone.
Related articles
- tiara time! the Cartier Portland Tiara (tiarasandtrianon.com)
- tiara time, part II: the Portland Tiara (tiarasandtrianon.com)
Why aren’t more ladies wearing their tiaras in the bath?
I don’t have an answer–the notion quite simply astonishes and delights!
LikeLike
when I get my tiara *sarcastic cough* I’m going to wear it (1) for a quick swing to the corner store for milk (2) all household chores and (3) possibly the gym. Picture me trying to balance the Poltimore while I do the elliptical. (yes, that was your cue to laugh.)
Come to think of it, balancing a crown of precious rocks would require a core-exerting posture. So picture me falling off to the side in a most comical way…
LikeLike
Lady Poltimore looks very disgusted in her photograph. Do you suppose that she found it terrible that the baron couldn’t afford a much sumptuous tiara or is her corset laced too tight?
LikeLike
For a “mere” baroness, I think she got plenty of tiara! Maybe she’s salty ‘cos she’s rocking that perm my mom had in 1984.
LikeLike
Pingback: the tiara time roster! | tiaras and trianon
Pingback: The Khedive of Egypt Tiara: a Tale of Three Generations of Royal Brides (Tiara Time!) | tiaras and trianon
Pingback: tiara time! the Lotus Flower Tiara | tiaras and trianon
Pingback: tiara update! Chamuet Belle Epoque Kokoshnik of the Westminsters no Longer Part of the Collection | tiaras and trianon
Sometimes I wonder if we’ll ever get to see these tiaras again. Or do they end up in some vault?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ick, they probably end up in some display case under expensive lighting in some rich douchebag’s living room. Or worse, his study…
LikeLike
What a waste. Tiaras should be worn and seen by all!
LikeLike
I meant tiaras should be seen by all. Not sure if everyone should wear a tiara….
LikeLiked by 1 person
The sad truth is there aren’t enough places to wear any sort of diadem nowadays–failing a massive social/formality upheaval. I would not mind in the slightest if we went back to corsets and dresses. Better for my posture [surely] and even the simplest 17th Century frock was far more flattering to a female silhouette!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed. We need to start a fashion revolution.
LikeLike